Right to speak act in india

Essential Elements of Article 19(1)(a), COI

• This right is available only to a citizen of India and not to foreign nationals.
• It includes the right to express one’s views and opinions at any issue through any medium, e.g. by words of mouth, writing, printing, picture, film, movie etc.
• This right is, however, not absolute and it allows Government to frame laws to impose reasonable restrictions.

Article 19(2), COI

• The exercise of this right is, however, subject to reasonable restrictions for certain purposes imposed under Article 19(2).
• The Article 19 (2) states that nothing in sub clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.

Significance of Article 19 (1)(a), COI

• Societal good: Liberty to express opinions and ideas without hindrance, and especially without fear of punishment plays a significant role in the development of a particular society.
• Self-development: Free speech is an integral aspect of each individual’s right to self-development and fulfilment. Restrictions inhibit our personality and its growth.
• Democratic value: Freedom of speech is the bulwark of democratic Government. This freedom is essential for the proper functioning of the democratic process as it allows people to criticize the government in a democracy, freedom of speech and expression open up channels of free discussion of issues.
• Ensure pluralism: Freedom of Speech reflects and reinforces pluralism, ensuring that diversity is validated and promotes the self-esteem of those who follow a particular lifestyle.

Case Laws

• In Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950): The Supreme Court (SC) observed that freedom of the press lays at the foundation of all democratic organizations.
• In Abbas v. Union of India (1970): The SC made it clear that censorship of films including pre-censorship was constitutionally valid in India as it was a reasonable restriction imposed on Article 19(1)(a) of the COI.
• In Bennett Coleman and Co. v. Union of India (1972): The SC struck down the validity of the Newsprint Control Order, which fixed the maximum number of pages, holding it to be violative of provision of Article 19(1)(a) and not to be reasonable restriction under Article 19(2) of the COI.
• InManeka Gandhi vs Union of India (1978): The SC held that the freedom of speech and expression is not confined to National boundaries.
• In Indian Express v. Union of India (1985): The SC held that the Press plays a very significant role in the democratic machinery. The courts have a duty to uphold the freedom of press and invalidate all laws and administrative actions that abridge that freedom.
• In Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala (1986): The SC held that the right to speak includes the right to be silent or to utter no words.
• In Union of India v. Assn. for Democratic Reforms (2002): The SC held that one-sided information, disinformation, misinformation and noninformation, all equally create an uninformed citizenry which makes democracy a farce. Freedom of speech and expression includes the right to impart and receive information which includes freedom to hold opinions.

Print This Article

What's New

Statements Made Under Special Circumstances Under BSA