Case Update: Joint Venture Agreement between developers and land owners

CONTRACT
Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) – Land owners entered into JVA with developer to develop land into housing development – Number of houses entitled by the land owners agreed– Part of land was acquired – Whether land owners’ entitlement has to be reduced

Summer Harvest Sdn Bhd v Michael Chang Tze Chon (suing as executor for the estate of Chan Chow Kong @ Chan Chau Ko, deceased) & Ors [2017] 5 MLJ 77, Court of Appeal

Facts The appellant, a developer, entered into a joint venture agreement (JVA) with the respondents, the land owners to develop a land into a housing development. The JVA provided that the respondents will be entitled to an agreed number of houses upon completion of the housing development. The JVA also anticipated the possibility of land acquisition and contemplated a proportionate reduction of the respondents’ entitlement. Later, the appellant was informed that part of the land was acquired by the government for highway construction. Subsequently, the respondents’ entitlement was varied several times. A dispute arose when the respondents sued the appellant in the High Court, alleging that they suffered loss as a result of the breach of obligations in the JVA by the appellant, which include failure to give titles and vacant possession of some units as well as varying the number and types of houses built that had unjustly enriched the appellant. On the other hand, the appellant argued that the respondents’ entitlement ought to be reduced proportionately and pleaded a set off sum for the units that were over-delivered to the respondents following the land acquisition. The High Court decided in the respondents’ favour, hence the present appeal.

Issue The main issue was whether the respondents’ entitlement ought to be reduced proportionately in light of the land acquisition in accordance with the JVA.

Held In allowing the appellant’s set off and dismissing the appeal, the Court of Appeal held that the respondents’ entitlement under the JVA should be reduced proportionately following the land acquisition. It was further ruled that there is no evidence showing that the respondents’ entitlement had been reduced proportionately, even though the subsequent layout plans of the development has excluded the acquired land from the development.

Case Updates Case Updates Case Updates

Personal Data Protection Notice

We at ZUL RAFIQUE & partners recognize the importance of privacy and the sensitivity of personal information. As required under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010, the purpose of this Personal Data Protection Notice (“Notice”) is to inform you how we collect and process your personal data when you appoint or engage us to provide services, when you access and use our website or interact with us including through meetings, seminars, conferences or events.

By appointing or engaging us to provide services to you, by accessing and using our website or by interacting with us, you consent to us using, collecting and processing your personal data in the manner contemplated in this Notice.

This Notice may be amended or updated from time to time. We would advise you to check this Notice on our website from time to time for amendments or updates. By continuing to use or engage our services, to use our website or to communicate with us subsequent to any amendments or updates to this Notice, it would confirm and indicate your acceptance to the amendments or updates to this Notice.

What Personal Data Do We Collect?

Personal data generally means any information that identifies you. Your personal data is collected and processed by us at the start of our services or interaction and, from time to time, in the course of our engagement or interaction.

The type of personal data collected and processed by us includes: